( 1 )
TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Judicial Authority between Islam and the Muhammadans

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

INTRODUCTION

PART I: The Judicial Authority in the Religion of Islam

CHAPTER I: The Discrepancy between Muhammad's Yathreb City-State and Caliphate Theocracies

CHAPTER II: The Judicial Authority and the Political Authority within Quran-Based Rule  

CHAPTER III: The Legislations Used by Judges

CHAPTER IV: The Conscience of Muslim Judges

PART II: The Judicial Authority in the History of the Muhammadans 

CHAPTER I: How Politicized Judicial Authority during the Era of Caliphs Corrupted Justice

CHAPTER II: The Position of Judges and the Whims of Caliphs

CHAPTER III: The Position of Judges and the Whims of Religious Scholars

CHAPTER IV: A Corrupt Female Slave Appointed as the Supreme Judge

CHAPTER V: The Collapse of the Judicial Authority within the Muhammadans during the Second Abbasid Era

CHAPTER VI: Abou Hanifa Refused to Be Appointed as a Judge

CHAPTER VII: Shureik as a Model of a Fair Judge during the Abbasid Era

CHAPTER VIII: Fair Judges

CONCLUSION

The Judicial Authority between Islam and the Muhammadans
The Judicial Authority between Islam and the Muhammadans
Authored by: Dr. Ahmed Subhy Mansour
Translated by: Ahmed Fathy


ABOUT THIS BOOK
This book has been authored in 2010, tackling the fact that the judicial authority in any era and state reflects the ruling system if it has been just and fair or tyrannical and unjust. The myth of the ''just tyrant'' is debunked and dispelled in this book. We explore how tyrannical quasi-religious notions of the Muhammadans and their despotic caliphs have rejected the Quranic teachings and caused the failure of all attempts to achieve justice. We discuss the Quranic notion of direct democracy (i.e., Shura consultation) as the ruling system linked directly to just and fair judicial authority.
more

اخبار متعلقة