Jewish groups not ‘backing sharia law’
اضيف الخبر في يوم السبت ٠٤ - يونيو - ٢٠١١ ١٢:٠٠ صباحاً.
Jewish groups not ‘backing sharia law’
The article you printed about the referendum in the US state of Oklahoma that would bar the introduction of Islamic sharia law into state courts (JC, May 27) was inaccurately headed, Jewish groups in US backing sharia law.
مقالات متعلقة
:
- God's Sharia Laws versus Man-Made Sharia Laws
- The 'Pious' Mameluke Sultan Al-Moayyad Sheikh Who Was among the Big Criminals – 2
- Because his Mother is an Israeli Jewish Woman, he Cannot Marry my Daughter!
- Unbelievers in the Quranic Context Signifies a Description
- Psychological Roots of Terrorism By Abdel Razak M Ali
- HOW SHARIA LAW PUNISHES RAPED WOMEN
- The Permissible and the Prohibited Food Items in Quranic Sharia Legislations
- The Quranic Sharia Legislation Methodology of Prohibition: A Practical Study
- Polytheists and Disbelievers in the Quranic Sharia Legislations of Marriage in Islam
The intent of the AJC’s brief was not to support sharia law, much less — as some readers have presumed, judging from emails I have received — to advocate or defend an imposition of sharia in the US. The Center for Islamic Pluralism is led by moderate Muslims, who follow traditional Islamic guidance and oppose the importation of public sharia law into non-Muslim countries.
The second paragraph of the article claimed that a “coalition of organisations that include the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the American Jewish Committee (AJC) are backing a legal appeal against a measure that would prevent Islamic law from being used in the state’s courts.”
No such coalition exists between the Council on American-IslamicRelations and the mentioned Jewish groups, much less with our organisation. We in CIP consider CAIR to represent radical, not “mainstream” Islam.
CIP defends private sharia in matters such as diet, burial, male circumcision, charity, and forms of prayer. In the words of the AJC’s brief, “to a reasonable observer, the amendment’s purpose plainly is to disapprove of the Islamic tradition.” The amendment violates American constitutional protection of the free exercise of religion.
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz
Executive director, CIP
اجمالي القراءات
1264
أضف تعليق
لا بد من تسجيل الدخول اولا قبل التعليق
اخبار متعلقة
فيديو مختار
دعوة للتبرع
مقالات من الارشيف
more
الصلاة فى فنلندة: كيف يمكن أن تقام الصلا ة في بلد كفنلن دا حيث...
إئتمر / تآمر : جزاك الله خيرا دكتور احمد قرأت لك ابداع ك في...
قال / قائل: ما معنى ( قائلو ن ) في قوله سبحان ه وتعال ى : ( ...
الوشم ليس حراما: السلا م عليكم شيخنا الكري م نرج و ان تكون...
عاشق الروح: شجع تنى رسالة الشاب المغت رب الذى يحب...
moreالرئيسية | عن الموقع | التيار القراني | القرانبحث | الاتصال| اساسيات اهل القران
Copyrights (c) 2006 MAH جميع الحقوق محفوظة(amir@ahl-alquran.com)