US to Bashir: Zero Tolerance for Gamesmanship

اضيف الخبر في يوم الأحد ١٢ - ديسمبر - ٢٠١٠ ١٢:٠٠ صباحاً.


US to Bashir: Zero Tolerance for Gamesmanship



The
story is all-too-familiar. A Sudanese town is burnt to the ground. Schools and
hospitals are targeted and destroyed. Hundreds of civilians are murdered by
tribal militia and 50,000 more are driven from their homes.

No, this
isn't a page taken from Sudan 's distant, bloody past. It's from May 2008, when
ethnic tensions erupted in Abyei, a contested area situated on the nation's
critical north-south religious and ethnic divide. Two-and-a-half-years later,
pressures are mounting again, posing grave dangers for the successful completion
of the north-south peace agreement and thus for the people of Sudan at large and
for the surrounding region, unless the U.S. and its allies act decisively
now.

In 2005, the U.S. played the key role in brokering Sudan 's
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). This accord ended more than 20 years of
civil war which left two million southern Sudanese dead and four million
displaced. It was triggered substantially by the resistance of the South's
Christian and animist population to the militant attempts by the government in
the North to impose its radicalized version of Islam.

The religious
component of the conflict was a key finding in 1999 by the U.S. Commission on
International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). Moreover, the Commission named Sudan
the world's worst violator of religious freedom during the war. As USCIRF
commissioners, we maintain that if war and tyranny are to be averted, the peace
agreement must be implemented fully.

The agreement, which is set to
expire next year, was designed to establish democracy, allocate oil revenues,
and ensure governing autonomy that would allow religious freedom, for the
besieged southern Sudan . It also included the Abyei Protocol, which places the
disputed area in northern Sudan , while having the North and South administer it
jointly for the duration of the agreement. The CPA is meant to culminate with
two related referenda mandated for January 9, 2011. The first referendum is on
self-determination for the southern Sudanese; the second concerns whether Abyei
remains in the North or becomes part of South Sudan .

Today the entire
CPA process and the prospects for peace in Sudan stand on the edge of a
precipice. With less than two months before the scheduled voting , the North's
National Congress Party (NCP) and South's Sudan People's Liberation Movement
(SPLM) have failed to agree on who should constitute the electorate in Abyei's
referendum. The NCP insists that the pro-Northern, nomadic Misseriya, who travel
through and utilize Abyei to graze their cattle, are eligible, while the SPLM
wants voting reserved for the indigenous Ngok Dinka community and other
established residents.

In recent months, negotiations over this issue
have stalled. In early October, an African Union meeting in Ethiopia , led by
former South African President Thabo Mbeki, failed to break the stalemate. A
second round of talks was postponed for lack of positive momentum.

Since
the two sides can't agree on residency, an Abyei Referendum Commission charged
with overseeing the vote has yet to be formed.

With an agreement on
Abyei nowhere in sight, time is running out in the effort to prevent a conflict
that could spark another ruinous North-South war that is centered on religious
freedom as much as control over oil and other resources. Heated rhetoric and
military incursions on both sides have escalated tensions. Both the NCP and the
SPLM are reportedly deploying troops near Abyei and along the North-South
border. Misseriya leaders threaten to take up arms if denied a chance to vote.
The South has repeatedly said it will not compromise on Abyei and SPLM Secretary
General Pagan Amum has complained that President Bashir's Khartoum government is
forcing it to pay a "ransom" for Abyei.

To end this impasse and avoid
armed conflict, the United States must take action. It must embrace its
responsibilities as a guarantor of the CPA and as the author of the Abyei
Protocol. To that end, the Obama Administration should assert itself. It should
immediately dispatch a senior diplomat to Sudan who will command the respect of
North and South alike to help resolve the dispute over Abyei residency and
voting eligibility, so the Abyei Referendum Commission can spring to life and
voting can begin.

The Administration, along with the international
community, must reinforce the original and true meaning of the Abyei Protocol
and its commitments which the United States helped create. Continued delay by
Khartoum and repeated efforts at re-negotiation of the terms of the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement provisions can only lead to renewed war. Holding
both parties to the agreements they made can avert it.

President Bashir
must stop the gamesmanship. No more do-overs. The time to act is now.

اجمالي القراءات 1447
أضف تعليق
لا بد من تسجيل الدخول اولا قبل التعليق