Search:
From the Archive
The myth that MUST be exposed
The Quranic Phrase (For The Cause of God) within the Dealings among People in this World and within the Last Day
The real Islamic Jihad in Palestine
Sociology_of_islam
The Lie of”The Grave torture and the bald serpent”( part two )
Please Say: (My Brethren/Brother in Humanity) and Never Say: (My Brethren/Brother in God)!
An Appeal To The United Nations To Try
Why Islam?
Forced Displacement: A Historical Fundamental Overview
Questioning the logic of Hadith
Pakistan: Bhatti's Murderers Promise More to Come
We Are Still Living in the Era of the Abbasid Caliph Al-Nasser
How the Muhammadans are impaled by a Pole: the Hadith (Saying) of Deeds Are Considered By Intentions
The Maturity of the US
Fatwas: Part Forty-One Issued by: Dr. Ahmed Subhy Mansour, translated by: Ahmed Fathy
À propos de notre émission YouTube «Quranic Moments»: Un appel addressé à nos chers coranistes
Fatwas Part Sixty-Seven
The Criteria of the Islamic Fatwa
Did the Maternal Uncles of Muhammad Belong to Yathreb or to Mecca?
The Stoning Myth
1-Why is woman's inheritance half that of man ?
Most contravention women issues in Islam

 

Most contravention women issues in Islam

Part "1"

1-Why is woman's inheritance half that of man ?

Hypothesis :

In proportioning inheritance, the Qur'an has appropriated men's inheritance to be twice that of women, and thus has instigated a major injustice and disservice towards half the humanity and that it may be this biased judgment that has been the source of so much humiliation for women in the eyes of men in Islamic societies.

The above opinion is usually expressed by women in religious discussions and it seems that this question is on the minds of many. What is for certain is that no part of any social, cultural, and religious system can be evaluated in abstract from the rest of the system. Inheritance too, is one of the components of the Islamic legal system which has to be considered with respect to the rest of the legal system and in relation with the decrees and edicts of this system. It is obvious that legal systems and responsibilities are always defined based on the natural needs and necessities of life and they are not necessarily one and the same.

In general, you may spend more money for your child who is in college and allocate much higher budgets for and his education and travels to and from college than for the one who is at home and may be more dependent on you. It is obvious that the amount of money parents allocate for their children, although they love all of their children to the same extend, is not the same and is dependent on their monetary needs and situation.

In the family of God, the woman has no obligation to provide for the living expenses of her family, and her own expenses are totally the responsibility of the man of the family, so much so that she can claim remuneration for any house work she performs, even for breast feeding her own child. In addition, at the time of the wedding , the man has the responsibility to generously offer to his wife the dowry which is the result of husband's savings and hard work of many years prior to marriage.

Fundamentally speaking, the issue of dowry as a promise for marriage , is considered to be one of the main pillars of marriage in Islam. Giving presents and spending money for one's wife is considered to be part of the responsibilities and virtues of generous men.

In such a system where all the expenditures are the responsibility of the man, and where the woman can save or invest all the money she makes, is it justified that they should both receive equal shares on inheritance ? Is it not true that the man's share is to be spent on family living expenses , and in the end it is returned to the wife and children? This should have no room for complaining.

Now, if some men do not perform their duties according to God's word and do not respect women's rights, what has this to do with God's religion ? Lack of respect for one's spouse can be a mutual event and should not be blamed on religion.

In western countries there is neither dowry nor distinction between a woman's house chores and her professional career. Women too, work full time in order to make the premiums on homes, automobiles, etc. It is natural therefore, that in such a regime inheriting half as much as the male would not seem justified. One has search for justice in this type of lifestyle, even though in reality this is not a fair situation for women.  

The woman's share of inheritance, which on the one hand , has the responsibility of running the house in addition to raising her children, and on the other hand, has to keep a profession outside of the house, may have to be twice that of the male. Do western men agree with this notion?

Instead of complaining about the Islamic system of justice which has designated men as the provider of financial needs of women for which service men ask women for their dedication to their husbands, i.e ., chastity , one has to hold western man responsible for not providing a just compensation for women. The financial responsibility of man is reciprocated for by woman's dedication to her husband, i.e., by keeping her chastity.


The views and opinions of authors whose articles and comments are posted on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of IQC.