Search:

Parasites In The Lands Of The Infidels

Egypts Resilient and Evolving Social Activism

Why did Trump strike Syria?

In an interview, Amr Adly discusses his recent Carnegie paper on Egypts large private enterprises.

Its Time to Take a Hard Look at the U.S. Relationship With Egypt

As we work to eradicate ISIS, Iraq's Christians, Yizidis need our help now more than ever

Should Americas Refugee Policy Put Persecuted Christians First?

Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century

Review: I Am Not Your Negro Will Make You Rethink Race

Inside Trumps shadow national security council

Turkey in Transition (?): Before and After the Attempted July Coup

Trump Signs Executive Order Curbing Obamacare

Lion's Den :: Daniel Pipes Blog

Ur-Fascism

Aid in reverse: how poor countries develop rich countries

35 Entrepreneurs Making a Difference in the Arab World

Trump could cause the death of think tanks as we know them

The Arabs had a country

The Islamic State is attaining its key goal, and U.S. media find the story of limited interest

While the Muslim Brotherhood gets all the ink, the Salafists go on a rampage.

Egypt, I like your style

The warning bells are ringing

To the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces

A test for the Muslim Brotherhood

Egypts changing foreign policy

Egypt beyond Mubarak

The dissolution of the NDP

Remaking Cairo from below

Why Egypt should join the ICC

No citizenship without social justice

Mubarak's message

A new era for US-Egypt relations?

The old regime must be prosecuted

Revolution Interrupted? Liberating the media

The Brotherhood on the edge of reform

Brother-tarianism

Buying the Peoples Assembly

What do Salafis really want?

A state of counter-emergency

Minimum wage a cure for 'corruption'

Beyond the referendum

Reform security, secure reform

The Tunisian Revolution: Initial Reflections

The Egyptian Revolution: First Impressions from the Field

Lest the revolution turn into a wasted opportunity

The U.S. Should Not Get Involved in Libya

Five positions on the revolution

Urbanised Islam behind Pakistan's Sufi shrine bombings

Rethinking Internal Security in Egypt

Leo Strauss and the Grand Inquisitor

Push ahead now for a solution in Palestine

The Ongoing Attacks on Egypts Coptic Christians

SAUDI ARABIA'S ECONOMIC NEEDS AND THE PRICE OF OIL

Saudi Arabia and the Spectre of Protest

America Quiet on the Execution of Afghan Christian Said Musa

Egypts Copts in Al-Qaedas Sights

The Worldwide Danger of Religious Fundamentalism

Tread Softly

RECLIMING WOMEN'S RIGHT TO DIVORCE IN ISLAM

HOW SHARIA LAW PUNISHES RAPED WOMEN Hasan Mahmud

The global force behind Mumbais agony is in our midst

Some Discussions about Quran, Violence and Fitnah

Terror in the Name of God

The Adventure of an Islamic Reformer at Oxford, London, and Istanbul

Thank God for Justice

Using C hristian Principles to Enhance Economic Theory and Practice:

Worldwide Hate Speech Laws?

Freedom Agenda In Flames

Commentary: Candidates should seek votes of Muslim-Americans

Why Barack is Winning?

Indian Muslims and 'Terrorism': Some Searching Questions

Taqlid, Ijtihad, and Democracy

Election 08: Senator Obama, American Muslims and IslamophobiaStatement of Concerned Scholars about I

Struggling against sectarianism: Shia-Sunni ecumenism

Happy Eid from Turkey

Book Review: Islam in Post-Modern World

The Concept of Jihad in Islam

Downhill in Afghanistan:

> How Not to Toast a Tyrant

How Not to Toast a Tyrant

Manufacturing 'Terrorists' The Indian Way

Madrasas: Reforms a Must

AZERBAIJAN-TURKEY-ISRAEL RELATIONS: THE ENERGY FACTOR

Fort Lauderdale's Anatolia Cultural Center endeavors to 'show the real Islam'

The Balance of Tomorrow:

Book Review: Aurangzeb Revisited

America wants Iraqs last drop of oil

Terrorising Muslims in the Name of Countering Terrorism

A proposal for new Iraqi/US co-operation and a suggestion of how this can be achieved

How will the Georgian struggle affect Iraq?

Is Obama a man of action as well as words?

Can moderate Iraqis believe Obamas promises?

Can Iraq be ruled successfully by a Shia/Kurdish coalition?

Name of the Book: Issues in Madrasa Education in India

Dangerous Portents in Jammu and Kashmir: A View From Doda

London School of Islamics

Rethinking Kashmir Politics

Norman G. Kurland, J.D

Sir Salman Rushdie's fatwa against freedom of expression

You Still Can't Write About Muhammad

Muslim Women: The Dangerous Triangle

Judeo-Christian "Rights of Liberty" (and Muslim "Rights of Justice," as well ???)

Turkey's dangerous message to the Muslim world

Captive to a Discarded Cause

Egypt's sexual harassment 'cancer'

The Origins and Legacy of the Movement to Fight Religious Persecution

LEBANON'S MILITIA WARS

A secular state must deliver

Islamic Economics Islam less, economics more-1

Exploiting the Muslim- Jewish divide is the wrong way to win votes.

How To Win The War Of Ideas (Glassman, WSJ)

The Olympic GamesPolitical Games?

Me without my Hijab

The changing face of American Islam

An Islamic case for a secular state

Getting a read on moderation

RETHINKING THE REVOLUTION?

Muslim Ghettoisation

Hurting their cause

Allah's Miracles in the Qur'an

Allah's Miracles in the Qur'an

Things are calm, time to talk

Awaiting China s implosion

The view from Bali

Why Blame Muslims Alone for Terrorism?

Consequences of Religious Extremism and the Lack of Democratic Principles

Cultural Accumulation and Modern Reading

Liberation Without War

Gaza's New Residents: Terrorists from all over.

Turkey in radical revision of Islamic texts

From the Archive
About our YouTube Show "Quranic Moments": A Call for our Dear Fellow Quranists
Today in Egypt
Fatwas: Part Forty-Eight
War on Terror
C-Reforming Muslims
The Egyptian Taliban State
Our Reply to a Question Posed by a Cultured Christian
The Mecca Crane Collapse and the fall of the Saudi Royal Family
The Islamic Reformer Ahmed Subhy Mansour says
Did Prophet Muhammad Know the Meaning of Everything in the Holy Quran?
Ruling and Judging Using Taghut
Three well-known experts evaluate the first year of the new state of K
Please Say: (My Brethren/Brother in Humanity) and Never Say: (My Brethren/Brother in God)!
Historic roots of Wahabism
The Holy Quran and the Destruction of the Al-Saud Family:
An Overview of the Commonwealth Countries in the Former USSR
Evaluating South Africas Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Syrian Refugees in Germany: Risks and the Solution
Contradictions in Divorce Legislations between The Quran and The Sunnite Jurisprudence
A devastating war between Israel & Hezbollah
it is Halal - Asalam alakyum A question for Dr Sobhi Is it halal or haram to wor... ......
- ... ......
Converting to Islam - Hello Dr. Mansour, Hope you're doing well. I have a friend who wants t... ......
Why did Trump strike Syria?

  by: : Aaron David Miller and Richard Sokolsky
(CNN) In a policy shift that will make heads spin, the Trump administration has in the space of a few days gone from a hands-off approach to the civil war in Syria to launching of dozens of Tomahawk missiles against a Syrian air base near the city of Homs.
So why the dramatic pivot? And what are the key takeaways from this development that has broken years of US reluctance to strike Bashar al-Assad directly?
 
Chemical weapons attacks genuinely moved Trump
 
President Donald Trump doesn't strike us as a sentimentalist, particularly when it comes to hapless citizens in foreign lands. But perhaps seeing the horrific pictures of the innocent victims -- particularly women and children -- he experienced a stunning moment of pathos and clarity about what was happening in Syria on his watch.
 
If those photos were supplemented with intelligence briefings describing the possible nerve agents used and their effects, the horrors would have been amplified. The Rose Garden news conference with the visiting King of Jordan -- one of the few Arab leaders who has actually stepped up to assist on Syria -- provided the perfect opportunity for a presidential moment to speak out against evil and pledge to do something about it. The President clearly felt a responsibility for a heinous act that he saw as a challenge to his leadership -- and we know how he responds when challenged.
 
He went out on a limb
 
That's the only thing that could have created the rhetoric Trump used in the Rose Garden. Trump all but drew his own "red line" over Assad's use of chemical weapons, which he said "crosses many lines."
 
Along with UN Ambassador Nikki Haley's implicit threat that the United States would take unilateral action if the UN Security Council didn't act, the administration had virtually put itself in a "put up or shut up" situation. Either the President made good on his red line threat, or he'd have ended up looking weak and feckless, like Barack Obama.
 
Trump can now draw a sharp line between the weak president who wouldn't act and the stronger president who has. Indeed, not to strike after his Rose Garden moment -- especially this early in his presidency -- would have damaged his credibility significantly.
 
Signaling to North Korea and Iran
 
There's not a shred of evidence to suggest that Trump's calculations on Syria relate to the other crisis hanging over his head: what to do about North Korea's nuclear weapons.
 
Still, it's is easy to imagine how Trump would see a strike on Syria as sending a powerful signal to Kim Jong Un that the United States was prepared to get tougher with him. US action in Syria will get the attention of the North Korean leader and his Chinese protectors. And that's precisely what the administration wants.
 
Still if this strike leads to a situation where the United States is actively intervening in Syria to change the regime, it could make Kim even more determined to cling to his nukes.
 
On Iran, the President has done a pretty significant about-face from his campaign rhetoric in adhering to the nuclear agreement. And the strike against Assad renews his pledge to be tougher with Iran and signals to Assad's chief backer that the United States is not a paper tiger and that there may be costs to supporting the Syrian dictator.
 
The administration is ramping up challenges to Iran's proxies in the civil war in Yemen, but Yemen is not a high strategic priority for the Iranians.
 
Whacking Assad will get the attention of the mullahs and the Revolutionary Guard. But it will also set the stage for a possible proxy war with the United States in Syria -- a confrontation in which Washington has few reliable allies on the ground.
 
And Putin makes three
 
How Putin will play the US strike over time isn't yet clear. The Russians have condemned the attack and threatened both to go to the United Nations and end communications with the United States over air campaigns in Syria. We will find out more when Secretary of State Rex Tillerson goes to Moscow next week.
 
 
Putin has no desire to tangle with the United States in Syria, but much of his reaction will be shaped by what the administration intends to do next.
 
If Washington's action is designed to restrain Assad's use of chemical weapons, the Russians -- who clearly knew about the attack in advance as their personnel were at the base from which it was purportedly launched -- may be embarrassed but willing over time to cooperate in helping to end their use.
 
But if the strike is designed to set the stage for further US pressure on Syria and indirectly on Russia, Putin will like push back against the US challenge in Syria. And that might set the stage for a US-Russian proxy struggle in Syria, where Moscow has many advantages on the ground.
 
A one-off or prelude to more?
 
And that brings us to the key question: What was the purpose of the strike?
 
Was it an effort to change Assad's behavior on using chemical weapons, or the beginning of a more fundamental US involvement in Syria to change his regime?
 
Will the United States now strike Assad when he uses conventional barrel bombs against civilians? Is the Trump administration going to ramp up training of the Syrian opposition? And is using military and political power going to begin a serious process of actually ending Syria's civil war?
 
Clearly, getting rid of Assad will help destroy ISIS, though that depends on whether the Trump administration is prepared to stay the course and is ready with a strategy for the day or more likely the decade after.
 
And that strategy will require a major investment of resources over a prolonged period of time for which the public, Congress and perhaps the administration may not be prepared.
 
We have long had our doubts about pursuing such a strategy in Syria, particularly without the region itself -- and especially Sunni Arabs -- playing the lead role. And we've long argued that such an approach may drag the United States into the muck of the Syrian civil war.
 
But no matter now. In view of this week's US strike -- even though it was necessary and proportional -- there's a reasonable chance that's where we're headed.
  
Aaron David Miller is vice president for new initiatives and a distinguished scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Richard Sokolsky, a non-resident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, was a member of the Secretary of State’s Office of Policy Planning from 2005-2015.
 
This article first appeared on CNN.com