From the Archive
The Maturity of the US
Having Islam on Our Side in Empowering Saudi woman and to Undermine Wahhabism
One Cannot Simultaneously Gratify the Lord God and the Vast Majority of Human Beings
When in Rome
Refuting the View of Dr. Farooq Al-Baz Regarding Tiran and ýSanafir Is
Concerning the Angels, Adam, Satan, and the Quranic Term (Call)
War on Terror
When the Mob Rules: between Royal and Republican Tyrannies
Islam Is the Valuable Religion of Higher Values, Unlike the Vile, Lowly, Man-Made Religions of the Muhammadans
The Struggle for Libyan Liberation
Egyptian President Sisi deceive the whole world
Swiss violation of the international law by imprion Col.Elghanam
(They Wish That You Would Soften in Your Position, So They Would Soften Toward You) (The Holy Quran: 68: 9)
As per the Quran, Egypt Is The Pioneer and Mother of Civilization of the Whole World, Even in Introducing Torture in Prisons!
Geopolitics and Sociology of Islam
Statement on the Hateful Speech against Muslims by Republican Presidential Contenders
Fatwas Part Ninety-Two
Religious Freedom at Congressional Hearing on
From Niqab to Decapitated Heads
Quranists Are the Solution to Combat ISIS, and Yet!
Feminism in Islam

Book Review

Feminism in Islam: Secular and Religious Convergences


By Margot Badran


Oneworld Publications, Oxford, 2009, pp.349


Reviewed by: Yoginder Sikand






Countless volumes have been written on the issue of Islam and women, by Muslims as well as others. Indeed, the ‘Muslim woman’ question has, for long, occupied a central place in discourses about Islam. Interestingly, the vast majority of works on this furiously-debated question have been penned by men. For many male Muslim writers, the notion of normative Muslim womanhood is key to their understanding of Islamic authenticity. For non-Muslim scholars of Islam, it is a central trope in their critique of the religion. Caught between the two, the diverse voices of Muslim women themselves have received but scant attention in the scholarly literature.




Margot Badran is one of the foremost chroniclers of Muslim women&a">Margot Badran is one of the foremost chroniclers of Muslim women’s struggles for gender justice. This latest book of hers explores broadly two types of women’s struggles for equality waged in different parts of the ‘Muslim world’. The first, which she traces to the colonial period, is what she labels as ‘Muslim secular feminism’, through which Muslim women (and some men) in different countries sought to assert their rights to education, employment and political participation. The arguments they put forward were, typically, secular, presented as a means for the empowerment and advancement of the ‘nation’ and the ‘community’. At the same time, these women were cautious to present their demands as being in accordance with their understanding of Islam. The second form of feminism is what Badran terms as ‘Islamic feminism’, which really emerged in a major way just a few decades ago. Much of the book is devoted to a detailed discussion of the forms, arguments and practical achievements of ‘Islamic feminism’.




 Far from being the oxymoron that many might think it is, ‘Islamic feminism’, Badran writes, is an even more radical and forceful form of feminism than was Muslim secular feminism at one time. ‘Islamic feminism’, she states, is based on the firm conviction about the fundamental equality of men and women as creatures of God, as stated in the Quran. On the basis of this belief and their re-reading of the Islamic tradition, ‘Islamic feminists’ argue that Islam itself demands the fundamental equality of women and men in all spheres of life, both in the personal as well as pubic domains. This demand for equality, Badran says, extends even to the religious sphere, for instance as regards religious professions and mosque rituals. Badran backs her case by citing certain Muslim women scholars—Aminah Wadud, Asma Barlas, Riffat Hasan being only the better-known among them—who seem to argue on somewhat these lines.




Unlike secular feminists, these ‘Islamic feminists’ seek to argue for women’s equality and gender justice wholly through the framework of Islam, broadly defined. Badran briefly describes (although one wishes that this could have been at greater length) the different methodologies that these women adopt in approaching the Islamic scriptural tradition, particularly those parts of the Quran, Hadith and fiqh or Muslim jurisprudence that might seem to militate against the notion of gender equality and gender justice. Badran terms the basic tool that these women apply in this regard as ijtihad, but, curiously, leaves out of the discussion the various rules and conditions governing ijtihad that have enjoyed wide acceptance among Muslims for centuries, according to which some of the formulations of these women writers might not be qualified to be regarded as genuine ijtihad at all. Just because these women might see some of their formulations as ijtihad does not mean that, from the perspective of ‘mainstream’ Muslims to whom these women appeal, these can be regarded as ‘authentic’ or ‘proper’ uses of ijtihad. Badran is, of course, aware of this problem but, yet, gives it scant attention.






Can these admittedly scattered voices—mostly of elite women, many based in universities in the West—be really taken to represent a social movement, in the true sense of the term? This is something that Badran does not deal with. The actual impact of the writings of these women, in terms of policy or legal changes or women’s mobilization at the ‘grassroots’, is missing in Badran’s otherwise engaging narrative. Absent, also, is any substantial discussion about the internal Muslim critique of their writings, mainly, though not only, by conservative ulema and Islamist ideologues on precisely Islamic grounds. This is, needless to say, an issue of immense practical import in that on it hinges the possibility or otherwise of popular acceptance of their interpretations of the faith.




Besides these elite Muslim women, some of who may well insist on being called ‘Islamic feminists’, are a much larger number of others who, working within a broadly-defined Islamic framework, shun the label, seeing the term ‘feminist’ as being tainted by its association with the West. They see their struggle as one that aims to recover what they variously understand as ‘authentic Islam’, and not, as the title of the book suggests, ‘feminism in Islam’. They may not go so far as the elite women-scholars Badran describes as being at the cutting-edge of the development of ‘Islamic feminism’ in their demands, such as, for instance, advocating women-led prayers for joint congregations or women muftis. Yet, Badran seems to lump them together with the elite women-scholars, inadvertently homogenizing what is admittedly a very diverse set of voices. Badran chooses to discuss these women as also representing forms of ‘Islamic feminism’, but, this, to my mind, does injustice to how these women see themselves and their struggles. Why impose categories on people against their will, one might ask? Why bracket them in boxes that they refuse to recognize? Why describe their struggles as ‘feminism in Islam’, when this is not how these women see themselves as promoting? If they see themselves as engaged in an ‘Islamic’, as opposed to an ‘Islamic feminist’ struggle, then why not let them define themselves on their own terms?




Despite these caveats, this book excels, and is bound to create more than just a splash in the midst of ongoing debates about the vexed ‘Muslim woman question’.


Allah, Farid, juhdi hamesha
Au Shaikh Farid, juhdi Allah Allah.
Acquiring Allah’s grace is the aim of my jihad, 0 Farid!
Come Shaikh Farid! Allah, Allah’s grace alone is ever the aim of my jihad
(Baba Guru Nanak Sahib to Baba Shaikh Farid Sahib)

Check out my blogs:

Allah, Farid, juhdi hamesha
Au Shaikh Farid, juhdi Allah Allah.
Acquiring Allah’s grace is the aim of my jihad, 0 Farid!
Come Shaikh Farid! Allah, Allah’s grace alone is ever the aim of my jihad
(Baba Guru Nanak Sahib to Baba Shaikh Farid Sahib)

Check out my blogs:

The views and opinions of authors whose articles and comments are posted on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of IQC.